Which is the best book for using 3D Studio Max?

I am looking to get into the saddle of some 3D rendering software (namely 3D Studio Max), and I was wondering what the best published companion would be to this program in order to enhance my use of it. Or if you know some very thorough online tutorials, that would be helpful; however, a book would be preferable.

Web based graphic desing portfolio?

I need to create a web based multimedia and graphic design portfolio of my work. However, I don’t want it to be published online. Are there any application forms which I can use to create my web based portfolio ? Something that looks like the sites Cargo creates. I know you can create your personal web portfolio using Dreamweaver but I’m not good at using this software. I’m looking for a programme that I can just add all my art and web work without having it appear online. I want a private web based portfolio to show my tutors. I’m lost!! thank you

have edited a website template & now i want to publish it online. Which files r to b pasted in ws_ftp?

i have files like index.html, read me, ac_runactive content , a4desk etc of the website template edited by me.
out of above files which file should i copy & paste into ws_ftp software or should i copy all of them ?

Please help me with software?

Ok I bought Driving Simulator 2009 by Excalibur publishing and when I tried to install it it kept not responding when I clicked install, I searched online and it said to install directx 9 I have directx 11 but I installed 9 anyway. This didnt do anything, so I went to safe mode and the program installed but when I tried to run it it said 3D initialisation failed or something along those lines, so I looked online again and it said that I needed to install directx 9 which I already had done and since having a higher version I would have thought that it’d work fine but it didnt, so if anyone has or has had similar problems and you know what to do or any help you can give would be great

Is there a software equivalent to Microsoft Home Publishing 99?

My cd set finally wore out but I love all the features!!! Is there a software with the same features i.e. cards, flyers, labels, partysets, etc. since they don’t make MHP anymore? My favorite feature was the thousands of clipart!

I have deleted our extensive mailing list from Cats Pajamas publishing software. Can I retrieve it?

Opinion: Should I publish my own software?

This is a follow-up question to the one I asked here:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjibIJhsMUVJjWv0hwu0mf3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090604222224AApUCDg

Now i’m curious if I should just go ahead and publish my own programs instead of going through a software developer. It’s more risk on me since I’ll have to take on more responsibilities, but I’ll be able to learn more about the business of making & distributing software that I can use in the future. what do you think?

Thanks!!

Was there “tortious interference” on any software projects in 1994-1995 ?

Something stopped the following from happening in some projects in 1994-1995.
What might that have been ?

<<Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry Magazine | MDDI Article Index

Originally published December 1994

SOFTWARE
A Maturity Model for Automated Software Testing
Mitchel H. Krause

Aside from their mandate to provide a safe and reliable product, manufacturers of computerized medical devices may have three very practical reasons for automating their software testing program: their product is too complicated to test manually, the time devoted to manual testing is cutting into potential profits, and current FDA requirements will be easier to satisfy with automated testing and documentation. If any of these factors motivates your company, this article will help you to sort out the issues to be considered and options available. Then, when the automated test program is in place, safer and more reliable products will follow.1 The sorting instrument presented is a maturity model that plots four levels of testing maturity in terms of the resources required to move from one level to the next. The model can be used to determine the level that best fits your company and its products.

THE SOFTWARE TESTING MATURITY MODEL

The software testing maturity model, shown in Figure 1, is similar to a software process maturity model that is familiar to many software engineers. It has been described by Watts S. Humphrey in his book Managing the Software Process,2 and has been cited by Frank Houston, a former FDA staffer, and Steven Rakitin in presentations to the Health Industry Manufacturers Association.3,4 The version shown here as Figure 2 is adapted from Rakitin’s presentation. The process model adapts well to automated software testing because effective software verification and validation programs grow out of development programs that are well planned, executed, managed, and monitored. A good software test program cannot stand alone; it must be an integral part of the software development process.

Level 1: Accidental Automation. The first level of the software testing model–like level 1 in the software process model– is characterized by ad hoc, individualistic, chaotic attempts to get the job done. Important information (for example, what to test) is not documented and must be extracted from in-house experts. Test plans are sketchy. Test results are not documented consistently. Schedules slip. Either products are delayed or testing becomes a cursory, poorly documented exercise. Management is uninvolved or uninformed.

This level has been designated Accidental Automation because the use of any automated tools or techniques comes about almost as if by accident and is not supported by process, planning, or management functions. Products released on the basis of such testing may well be accidents waiting to happen. Testing at this level may be appropriate only for a product that has no potential for harming the patient or user; it is never appropriate for a computerized medical device.

Level 2: Beginning Automation. The second testing level corresponds directly to Level 2­Repeatable in the software process maturity model (see Figure 2). There are hundreds of capture-and-replay test tools on the market today that simply repeat the responses of a system under test.5 As in the process model, however, these tools have limited capabilities and lose their economic usefulness quickly as a product changes.

Level 2 testing is still dependent on information locked in the minds of in-house experts, although documentation is beginning to appear in the form of software requirements specifications (SRSs) and test requirements specifications (TRSs). However, in most cases, large portions of these documents are written after the fact and used to meet regulatory requirements rather than to direct the development and test processes. Writing them does, however, provide good practice for moving to level 3.

Level 3: Intentional Automation. At the third level, automated testing becomes both well defined and well managed. The TRSs and the test scripts themselves proceed logically from the SRSs and design documents. Furthermore, because the test team is now part of the development process, these documents are written before the product is delivered for testing. Consequently, schedules become more reliable. Level 3 is appropriate for many medical device manufacturers.

Level 4: Advanced Automation. The highest testing maturity level is a practiced and perfected version of level 3 with one major addition: postrelease defect tracking. Defects are trapped and sent directly back through the fix, test creation, and regression test processes. The software test team is now an integral part of product development, and testers and developers work together to build a product that will meet test requirements. Any software bugs that do occur are caught early, when they are much less expensive to fix. When testing i
. When testing is performed at this level, an FDA inspector can pick up any piece of product documentation and trace the development process all the way from the SRS that describes the feature to the test results that validate it.
A Checklist of Issues. How can these software testing maturity levels help a company to plan and implement an automated software test program? The answer to that question comes from careful consideration of four issues:
* What is the profile of your company and its products?
* What processes do you need to implement as part of an automated testing program?
* What kind of people do you need in order to create and run a testing program?
* Which automated software test products fit your profile and process?
Significantly, price is not on the list. That is because the cost of any one component, especially the test tool, becomes insignificant when it is compared with the potential payback. A well-planned and well-executed software test automation
process will pay for itself many times over by ensuring fewer bugs and field fixes, shortening product development cycles, and providing labor savings. And, if you keep your ultimate goal in mind when defining processes, choosing staff, and buying test tools, your testing program will continue to yield a good return as you advance from one level of maturity to the next.
PROFILE: RANKING YOUR COMPANY’S PRODUCTS
Most computerized medical devices can benefit from some type of automated testing. In fact, Boris Beizer, who is probably the most well known expert in the field of software testing, has said, “As far as I’m concerned, manual testing is ludicrous and self-contradictory. It’s based upon a fallacy. Anybody who thinks they can test manually, doesn’t take into account the error rate in manual test execution.”5 However, knowing what level of automation is appropriate requires a good understanding of your company’s products.
The exercise described below will help you to create a
test-level profile of your company and its products. The profile is a guide to how your company may benefit from an investment in processes, people, and automated software test products. The point scores at the end of each section provide a rough estimate of the level of software testing maturity you should strive to meet.
How Large Are Your Software Projects? As software projects increase in size, the resulting products become harder to test and at some point manual testing can no longer cover enough functionalities to ensure safe and reliable products. There are many ways to measure the scope of a software project, but a simple line count is a start:
* Score 1 if your product has fewer than 10,000 lines of code.
* Score 2 if your product has between 10,000 and 30,000 lines of code.
* Score 3 if your product has between 30,000 and 70,000 lines of code.
* Score 4 if your product has more than 70,000 lines of code.
How Complex Is Your Product? Systems with multiple inputs
and outputs, graphics screens or printers, embedded processors, or multiple microprocessors are all candidates for the controlled sophistication of automated testing. If two or more interactive processors are used, the product probably presents integration and timing issues that cannot be tested manually. Similarly, if the product has an embedded processor, it may have functionalities that cannot be tested manually. In other cases, it may simply be impractical to test the system manually. Printers are one example of a common peripheral that is hard to test by hand. They not only accept commands and data from a software system, they also send back status and error signals to which the system must respond correctly. It is slow, inconvenient, and sometimes impossible for a tester to follow test plans that try to duplicate all the combinations of acknowledgment, system-busy, paper-out, baud rate, error, select, sensor, and other signals the printer might return. The input simulation
provided by a sophisticated automatic test system can both speed up this process and make it traceable and reproducible.
Even testing of that seemingly ubiquitous input device, a keyboard or keypad, can benefit from using an automated test tool with simulation capabilities. Timing issues, especially, are nearly impossible to test manually. The fatal accidents in the mid 1980s that involved a radiation therapy machine are a good example of the kinds of problems that can occur. This particular machine had both therapy and diagnosis modes, and operators entered a series of keystrokes to switch the system from a high-energy to a low- energy mode. If the keystrokes were typed in too fast, however, the high-energy mode would remain in effect even though the operator would assume the change had been made. Later, when the system was activated, it sent a damaging and sometimes lethal dose of radiation into the patient.6 An automated test tool with simulation capabilities could have detected
this problem early, before any harm was done. Keyboard simulations could have been set up to test the effect of varying keyboard input speeds. (The actual resolution of the problem involved many factors in addition to keyboard input speed; the report cited gives a full account of these accidents and their outcome.)
System outputs may also be tested more efficiently using automated methods. After an 8-, 10-, or 12-hour day, even the most conscientious human tester will fail to notice some errors or forget to document them. Other outputs either cannot be monitored manually or the testing may require nonintegrated measurement devices that may be difficult to set up and monitor. Finally, some potentially fatal software flaws may never show up during functional (black-box) testing. Detecting these problems requires an automated system that can use white-box test methods to look inside the system.1
* Score 1 if your product has a single processor and simple inputs and outputs.
* Score 2 if a malfunction or failure of your product presents a small but acceptable risk to the financial health of your company.
* Score 3 if a malfunction or failure of your product presents an unacceptable risk to the financial health of your company.
* Score 4 if a malfunction or failure of your product would cause irreparable harm to your company.
What Risk Does Your Product Pose for the Patient and Operator? Although concerns about size, complexity, and financial risk are important in all software projects, the bottom line for a medical device company is risk to patients and health-care providers. Medical products must be both safe and effective. That is, they must do what they are designed to do and, when something does go wrong, the malfunction or failure must cause no harm. The product’s FDA classification and hazard analysis results may determine if automated testing should be implemented. If a computerized medical device is categorized as Class II or Class III,
an automated software test program may be necessary to provide both the testing and documentation required. Similarly, if the product presents software-related hazards, an automated test program might help your company to verify, validate, and document the measures taken to mitigate those hazards.
* Score 1 if your product is FDA Class I and a hazard analysis has shown there is no possibility of its software causing harm to a patient or operator.
* Score 2 if your product is FDA Class I and a hazard analysis has shown there is a remote possibility of its software causing harm to a patient or operator.
* Score 3 if your product is FDA Class II.
* Score 4 if your product is FDA Class III.
Evaluating Your Scores. In its “Reviewer Guidance for Computer-Controlled Medical Devices,” FDA supplies an approach to evaluating the scores assigned in this exercise: “When a level of concern is assigned for each functioning component of the software, the highest level of concern generated
is that assigned to the software aspect of the device.”7 Thus, if you want to ensure the long-term success of your company, aim for the level of automated software testing equal to your highest score in any category.
PROCESS: CONTROLLING TEST POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
If any one word sums up the regulatory demands being placed on medical device manufacturers, it is process. No matter how much effort goes into designing, testing, and manufacturing a product, an auditor will not be satisfied if the process is not written down, followed, and documented. Process-related expenses will be incurred regardless of the testing level achieved or whether or not the software test process is automated; however, they can vary significantly across the testing levels.
Level 1 Process Costs. When software testing is at level 1, process costs are hidden. They arise from not having a defined process and can be very high, indeed. Such costs can include those incurred by delayed product introductions,
the need for frequent field fixes, and a generally ineffective product development effort.
Level 2 Process Costs. Surprisingly, process costs can be highest for a company that is testing at level 2, especially one that is contemplating a move to level 3 in the foreseeable future. The costs are high because at level 2 the company is probably just starting to evaluate its software testing needs and to put standardized procedures in place. It may have to experiment, hire consultants, and establish or expand job areas, such as regulatory affairs.
Process Costs at Levels 3 and 4. Although the two major forces behind process improvement–FDA regulation and the need for ISO 9000 certification–may affect any company, those testing at levels 3 or 4 almost certainly need to meet FDA software test requirements. Such compliance is expensive and time-consuming, but the good news is that creating and documenting procedures for an automated testing program is no more expensive than doing so for
a manual one. In fact, use of an automated test tool with scripting, test identification, and automatic documentation capabilities can reduce costs by providing some of the framework and content required.
The FDA “Reviewer Guidance for Computer-Controlled Medical Devices Undergoing 510(k) Review” states that “FDA is focusing attention on the software development process to assure that potential hazardous failures have been addressed, effective performance has been defined, and means of verifying both safe and effective performance have been planned, carried out, and properly reviewed.”8 In order to get marketing approval for any product, its manufacturer must prove to FDA that the product does what it is supposed to do and that it is safe. The way to do that is not only through clinical trials but also by documenting the process that was followed to make the product eligible for such trials.
In contrast, ISO 9000 certification is based on process alone. Because the products
themselves are not certified, the certification authority is concerned solely with whether the process that created the product is traceable, repeatable, and documented. When the process is proven, the site responsible for making the product is certified. An ISO 9000 certification audit costs about $10,000 to $20,000, but that is only the barest tip of the iceberg. The total cost includes the resources required to evaluate the company’s needs, get the appropriate procedures in place, have them audited and approved, and motivate personnel to use them.
If established procedures are being revised to accommodate automation, existing regulatory affairs and quality assurance personnel may need to devote two to four weeks each to the project. In addition, it may take a technical writer about a month to rewrite the policy and procedure manuals. Finally, occasional technical support will be required from software developers and test engineers.
PEOPLE: CHOOSING QUALIFIED TESTERS
No matter what type of testing a company does, manual or automated, experienced people are needed to create the test plans and write test scripts.
Level 1 People Costs. At test maturity level 1, testing is often limited to debugging. A programmer writes and debugs the product’s software until everything seems to work correctly. Because only the programmer is involved, testing costs are hidden in the cost of development. Likewise, the potential benefits of better test practices are hidden in field-support and product- upgrade costs. Thus, level 1 people costs are essentially unknown.
Level 2 People Costs. In software testing programs at level 2, testing is recognized as a separate function. Test plans and scripts are generally written by an experienced product user or support person who may or may not have programming experience. In any case, the person performing this task must understand the SRSs and design specifications well enough to write a comprehensive test plan and test
scripts. The scripts are then given to testers who run them and record the results. One option is to hire a group of low-paid, inexperienced users; another is to recruit testers in-house. Whoever the testers are, they must understand that their job is to try to break the system as well as to make sure it works right. Level 2 people costs may also include one or more high-level support people to coordinate test writing, supervise the testers, and edit the results. Also, since the labor that goes into setting up a capture-and-replay tool is not reusable, the cost of one test cycle must be multiplied by the number of test cycles expected.
People Costs at Levels 3 and 4. Automated testing plans are most often written by a software test engineer, who should also participate in product development meetings with design engineers to help build testability into the product. The test engineer’s programming background combined with a familiarity with the product will ensure the creation of
efficient tests that attack the weakest parts of the product. If the test tool has white-box test capabilities, the test engineer uses his or her knowledge of system internals to specify tests for functions that cannot be tested manually.
The test plan is then used to write the test script programs. This work can be done by the test engineer or given to application programmers. The level of programming experience required to write test scripts depends on the test tool used. Generally, the most versatile tools run on scripts written in some version of a common programming language, such as C. Other tools use simplified languages. In any case, at least one member of the test team must have some familiarity with writing a structured set of instructions. Because the automated testing tool runs the tests and creates the documentation, no costs are added for hiring testers or diverting in-house personnel to perform and document the tests.
PRODUCTS: CHOOSING THE RIGHT TESTING TOOL
The requirements of the product and process determine the selection of an automated testing tool. However, medical device manufacturers should beware of confusing development aids with automated software test tools. Companies can spend large sums on many kinds of debugging tools and in-circuit emulators and still not have an automated test program. A software development aid has done its job when the product, or product component, is debugged and seems to work. Automated test tools, on the other hand, are designed not only to verify the system, but also to stress it to the point that it will break in the lab before it can fail in the field and harm a patient or operator.
Level 1 Tool Costs. Although development aids such as debugging programs and in-circuit emulators may be used in level 1 test programs, no automated test tools are used. Therefore, there are no tool costs at this level.
Level 2 Tool Costs. Level 2 testing is the domain of simple capture-and-replay tools that employ
rudimentary scripting capabilities and are often used to verify operator interfaces. Prices for such tools start at about $200 and can reach $5000 or more for the more-sophisticated models. The less-expensive, software-only versions are often intrusive; that is, they run on the same computer as the software application being tested. Because the tool and product occupy the same space, product timing and performance can undergo unpredictable changes. Even if no problems show up during testing, the product shipped is never exactly the same as the product tested. Capture-and-replay tools with integral capture hardware eliminate the problems associated with intrusiveness but retain another problem characteristic of such systems–inflexibility.
Because a capture-and-replay test suite for a graphic user interface (GUI) can contain thousands of captured screen images and consume megabytes of memory, the time it takes to gather these images is significant. Timing variations and the fact that
GUI displays are seldom static can add even more time. Most significant, however, is the amount of time needed to recapture, integrate, and retest the inevitable changes caused by debugging and last-minute product upgrades. Thus, capture-and-replay tools should be used only for the simplest of products.
Tool Costs at Levels 3 and 4. High-level test tools can include several advanced capabilities in addition to capture and replay. The following are features to look for when purchasing tools:
* Scripting. The tool’s test script language should be as functional as a high-level computer language, permitting the inclusion of files, libraries, loops, and conditional statements. It also should include aids to help debug the scripts themselves.
* Monitoring. A choice of intrusive software monitoring, such as that used in capture- and-replay tools, or nonintrusive hardware monitoring of system outputs may be available. An added high-level feature in the most sophisticated systems is
direct-processor monitoring. With direct-processor monitoring, a connector similar to an in-circuit emulator pod is mounted on the processor and monitors the activity of the product under test. The test tool is nonintrusive because the connector never sends signals to the application being tested. It is also quite fast and accurate because it works at the processor level.
* Black-Box Simulation and Stimulation. A high-level tool should be able to emulate the actions of a human tester. Hardware is available that can simulate such product stimulations as keys being pressed, printers responding, tones being generated, relays opening and closing, and other analog or digital inputs. In short, advanced simulation capabilities should enable tests to run unattended.
* White-Box Simulation and Stimulation. The test tool should also be able to simulate and monitor the internal workings of the product tested. Such white-box testing capabilities permit testing of timing, integration, and
and resource issues that cannot be tested manually.
* Documentation. Automated test tools can log both test parameters and test results. If integrated into the software development process, a sophisticated system should be able to produce much of the documentation required by regulatory agencies.
Test tools suitable for testing at levels 3 and 4 cost from $15,000 to $75,000.
CONCLUSION
As described above, once you determine your company profile, perfect your processes, establish test specialists, and give the team members appropriate testing tools, your company can realize the benefits of automated software testing. When compared with manual programs, automation properly applied will result in higher-quality products, lower risks to your company and the patients you serve, faster regulatory approvals, and decreased time to market. The higher level you reach on the automated software testing maturity model, the more benefits you will realize. Whatever level you choose,
however, keep in mind a major lesson of the last 30 years of computing: No matter what tools you buy, your largest investment by far will be in the processes and people you put in place to use those tools. Purchase automated software testing tools based on how they can maximize your investments in processes and people, not on the price of the tools themselves.>>
(for author’s references – see author’s original paper)

Does Murphy’s Law tell you you need to assume this will happen on your safety-critical software project unless?

there are special checks in place to guard against these possibilities ?

<<Q/Would it be true that most organizations can't successfully produce safety-critical software ?
A1/There will be people in your organization whose modus operandi has always been and always will be : get someone else to jot ideas on a whiteboad – then they make some changes and publish the ideas as their own. This can’t possibly work for safety-critical software – most mutations of the computer program won’t work. So an organization publishing safety-critical software will be publishing software that most likely doesn’t work because it was doctored at the equivalent of the “whiteboard”.

A2/ On your analysis we should trawl the archives of the organization, looking for evidence that the software was doctored. What would I look for – cryptic comments in the code ?

A3/Worth a try. Someone might have woken up to what was going on and generated a “difference” file showing the changes, and archived the difference file.

A4/Implication is that the software doesn’t work.
So testing must have been forged somehow.

A5/If there is model-based testing, rest assured the model will have been doctored to “reflect the released code”. So you’ll have your work cut out for you, trying to pin anything on the culprits.

A6/Things COULD work, if there was a functioning “personnel department” which tried to select decent people, AND checked that the (presumably doctored) system being published actually worked.

A7/Can we take it as a given that there is no functioning “personnel department” which tried to select decent people ?

Can we take it as a given that no-one checks that the (presumably doctored) system being published actually works ?

A8/How likely is it that a “personnel department” could be “neutralized” so that it no longer selected decent people ?

A9/Very likely. A personnel person leaves and a senior person elsewhere in the organization suggests that existing remaining personnel people (who have possibly twigged that there is something wrong with that senior person) somehow lack sufficient experience to be promoted to the vacancy.

How to publish a VB program to ClickOne application and run on other machines without installing any software?

It run perfectly on my own laptop but when I tested it on other machine. It shows “The application requires that assembly MS.VB.PowerPacks.Vs version 9.0.0.0 be installed in the Global Assembly Cache (GAC) first.” I want the application to be run on other machines without installing any software. Any idea on how to do it?

What are the differences between word processing, desktop publishing and presentation software?

Paragraphed answers would be helpful
Thanks

What is the best software for writing & publishing a textbook/manual?

For Windows, please.

What is the best strategy or software for backing up a blog?

I have a blog that is several years old. It has hundreds of entries, most of them meticulously researched and linked. It is a blogspot blog.

However, it is a blog on a very controversial topic, and at various times it has been hacked and at other times people who do not like the content of the blog have launched “Report Violation” attacks simply because of the controversial nature of the content.

I would like to back up the blog, either by establishing a mirror site that is unknown and unsearchable, by backing the blog up online, or by backing it up on my hard drive or other media. The third option is, to me, preferable, especially if I could back it up into a .doc or .pdf file, consequently edit, and eventually publish as a paper or electronic book. Ideally, no matter how or where the backup occurs, I would like for it to be automatic.

I find quite a bit of software for WordPress blogs. I find nothing reputable for blogspot blogs. Can anyone recommend a site or software that can do what I need? Would you also discuss the features of the software or site when answering the question?

Thanks!
It is not a WordPress blog. It is a blogspot blog.

What are the legalities involving taxes and copyright/trademark/patents for an online business?

I recently decided to start my own online business once I had an idea for a website that could fill a huge untouched niche. I can’t talk much about what it is about yet, because I want to patent/trademark/copyright whatever I need to beforehand. I have two areas I need advise on:

1- My main source of revenue in the beginning would be website subscriptions. I need some advise on how tax works in this situation. I want to set it up as a business, so that I can expand it more later, but physically there wouldn’t be an office anywhere (at least at first), and I’ve heard that it is possible to get a lawyer or someone to help establish an online business in a state other than where I live in order to pay less for taxes. Is this legal, and how does it work? Is it advisable to do it if I really do want to have a physical office somewhere later on?

My other question is about legalities. Does anyone know if it is possible to patent a website configuration, rather than the software that uses it? I will be purchasing the software I need to run the website, but I want to make sure no one else can come in and copy me. Also, how does Trademark work for websites? Would I need to trademark my website name and company name separately, even if they are very similar? Lastly, How does copyright work on things published via website?

Thanks in advance for anyone who might be able to answer questions or direct me to find some answers.

Who can help me develop graphics for an electrical engineering book and how much would it cost?

I’m working on a book of calculations, measurements, rules, etc., for electrical engineers that I’d like to publish. I need help with creating the images for this book. More specifically, I need images for different electrical wiring systems, conduits, conductor sizings, etc. These may or may not be available online. I am aware of sites such as istockphoto.com, corbis.com, sxc.hu, but they don’t offer everything I need.

Would the best solution be for me to draw it out on paper and have a freelancer pretty it up? Is there a site that offers eletrical engineering graphics that I may use? Are there any software applications that I may use (not talking Photoshop, but engineering related apps) to generate these images myself?

Thanks.

How do you wright an index file for a website?

If you can help-GREAT! Im using publisher and needed help publishing my website, so i called my hosting company and they said i needed to wright an index file because publisher didn’t automatically wright one. He said that i should buy a “Real” web publishing software. The only problem is I don’t have the money! So he told me to look it up online and I didn’t find anything so, that’s were i’m at now. I guess this is what i’m asking- 1. If i should relay invest in software if so any recommendations? and 2. How do I Wright an index file?? Once again,TY so much!!! I truly can not thank you enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
P.S if you say html it-how???

Opensource publishing software?

I’m looking to make a monthly newsletter for my Cadet Squadron, but I currently have no software to do it. Microsoft Office Publisher would be ideal but that’s expensive, and we’re a Charity, so is there an opensource alternative?

What’s good publishing software?

I am starting a magazine but I can’t afford the Adobe Creative Suite software. I am looking for something that is almost exactly like Adobe Illustrator, PhotoShop and InDesign that won’t cost me a fortune. Can someone please help!?

If an organization publishes automatic pilot software for aircraft, how would it avoid recruiting a?

“whack job” to their computer programming team ?

(A “whack job” would be likely to program the system so when a pilot tries to land a plane a message comes up “the plane has already landed, try some other option”)
To Future Pilot.

Thanks.

I seem to read about AirBus overriding the pilot’s commands.

I was wondering if a “whack job” had programmed the AirBus program.

What kind of software should I be trained in?

I recently changed career focus from administrative work to marketing and design work. My degree is in English writing, but I have a passion for marketing/advertising, desktop publishing, web design, editing and proofreading. I’ve always been interested in programming too.

I’m extremely proficient in computers, am very creative and a fast learner, but I have fallen out of touch with what software packages are popular or in demand by most employers.

I am already at expert level with Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access and Outlook). I’m intermediate with Adobe Acrobat and Reader. And I’ve dabbled in Dreamweaver and Microsoft FrontPage a bit.

I want to have the upper hand as far as what software packages I have under my belt.
Can you suggest some of the best software programs for me to learn? What is in demand today?

Thanks!